Home / Research

Decepticon

Autonomous Hacking Agent for Red Team

FreeShort listing
Visit website

Sign in to rate this tool.

Overview

Decepticon screenshot

Decepticon is marketed as an autonomous hacking agent designed for red‑team and security‑research work. It acts as a use that brings together specialist sub‑agents, tools, infrastructure components, and evidence collection inside a scope that you approve. The product is developed by Bitter Security and is positioned as a way to run coordinated offensive operations without leaving the control of the operator.

The workflow starts with an “intent” interview that builds an OPPLAN. During this guided questionnaire you specify the target scope, rules of engagement, and the objectives you want the operation to achieve. The system records these parameters and uses them to enforce boundaries at runtime. Once the OPPLAN is saved, Decepticon launches a series of sub‑agents that each handle a phase of the attack lifecycle, reconnaissance, initial access, and post‑exploitation. These agents are tied to ATT&CK techniques and Skillogy playbooks, so their actions follow documented tactics rather than a single generic prompt. As each sub‑agent runs, you can watch its commands and results in real time on the workspace UI. The output includes logs, screenshots, and any artifacts that the agent gathers, all stored as evidence linked to the original objective.

Safety mechanisms are built into the platform. Before any command is sent to a target, Decepticon checks whether the action falls inside the approved scope and rules of engagement. If the action is out‑of‑scope, it is blocked and the operator is notified, preserving the OPSEC posture. This design means you remain in control of the run; you can approve or reject pivots, adjust objectives, and add new evidence as the operation evolves.

A read‑only sample workspace is available directly on the website without requiring an account. The sample uses pre‑saved data to illustrate how an operation is assembled, how sub‑agents are orchestrated, and how evidence is captured. It does not execute live tests, so you can explore the interface safely. For real engagements against authorized targets you must create a separate account, and the site refers you to a pricing page for Solo and Pro tiers. Access to live operations is handled separately from the free sample.

The listing also provides benchmark data: Decepticon achieved a 98.08 % pass rate on the XBOW validation benchmark, solving 102 of 104 real‑world exploitation challenges.

Details

Pricing
Free
Category
Research
Suggest an edit

Sign in to suggest an edit.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Structured interview ensures clear definition of scope and objectives, reducing accidental out‑of‑scope activity
  • Sub‑agents are tied to known ATT&CK techniques, providing transparent, technique‑level visibility
  • Real‑time monitoring lets you verify each step and collect evidence automatically
  • High benchmark pass rate indicates strong capability on a recognized exploitation suite

Cons

  • Live operations require a paid account; the free sample does not allow testing against real targets
  • Pricing information is only referenced, not detailed in the listing, so cost cannot be evaluated from this page
  • No user case studies or third‑party audits are provided to corroborate the benchmark claim.

Alternatives